# Pierre Code Storage

8 Hacker News commenters recommended Pierre Code Storage and 6 criticized it, November 2025 to November 2026. It was recommended in 3 of 13 months.

**Verdict:** Git-backed storage API built for high-volume files and LLM workflows, with unlimited storage; critics mainly object to network ingress and egress fees.

## Why people recommend it

- Useful for blobs and non-code data (3 comments): "Wow, this looks potentially amazing! I've been look for a way to use Git for smaller, high volume document storage" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017185)) "We have folks using us to back crms, design tools, and all kinds of "non-code" stuff." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47018453)) "The blob thing is cool but otherwise it's a really confusing website." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47016192))
- Handles large, high-volume storage (2 comments): "Wow, this looks potentially amazing! I've been look for a way to use Git for smaller, high volume document storage" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017185)) "Code.storage is able to handle large scales too" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49339546))
- Unlimited storage and request rates (2 comments): "Code Storage is just a headless, api-first infra product. No users, no review primitives, no rate limits, etc." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017025)) "Total storage limit | Unlimited | Git request rate limits | Unlimited" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49339525))
- API-first design for automation (2 comments): "Code Storage is just a headless, api-first infra product. No users, no review primitives, no rate limits, etc." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017025)) "our API is built specifically for common LLM workflows" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47018591))

## What people warn about

- Network ingress and egress fees (3 comments): "charging network ingress ($0.06) and egress fees ($0.15)?! what a ripoff, non-starter" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47000591)) "The prices are ridiculous imo, charging for network ingress is a full stop" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017490)) "They are a no way for me, especially the network fees" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017293))
- Expensive pricing overall (2 comments): "And it only costs $30K per year for a single terabyte of usable (NVMe?) storage." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47016272)) "Pierre CC has really exorbitant pricing that would cost even more." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47030648))
- Confusing, dated site design (4 comments): "The blob thing is cool but otherwise it's a really confusing website." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47016192)) "I had to close the tab after 10 seconds as I got immediate anxiety." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49339926)) "It doesn't look professional in the sense of a mature business" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017287))

## Alternatives hackers recommend

- [Pushin](https://hackerapproved.com/p/pushin.md): 6 recommend

## Cite as

Hacker Approved, "Pierre Code Storage", https://hackerapproved.com/p/code-storage/ (counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026).