Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Claude Science

AI workbench in AI tools

People recommend it for fast, scripted analyses of research data, with the caveat that its outputs can contain hallucinations that need checking.

People recommend it for fast, scripted analyses of research data, with the caveat that its outputs can contain hallucinations that need checking.

30 people gave an opinion

recommend it
11
criticize it
19
approval share
37%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 3 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: not recommended
  2. December 2025: not recommended
  3. January 2026: not recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: not recommended
  8. June 2026: recommended
  9. July 2026: recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 11 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
  • 0.5 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 3 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, not met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Fast results on data analyses

    “knocked out my analyses in minutes using command line tools like bcftools and scripting”

    Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

    “Claude Science seemed to make very easy work of it.”

    Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

    “it solved it in about a minute”

    Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Hallucinations and unreliable outputs

    “On the one hand this is way better. On the other hand it's just good enough that your spot check will look good and your work will still contain hallucinations”

    Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

    “a nice but verbose literature overview of my chosen topic that includes at least one hallucinated reference”

    Comment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”
  • Costly subscription and profit-driven design

    “one or two companies holding the keys to "progress" for a monthly subscription price”

    Comment from 25 Sep 2026 in “Yes, Claude can do nine loops”

    “$200/mo. Me, a scientist: copy-pasting into Claude and saying "I did the analysis."”

    Comment from 2 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

    “Shows how their priorities are for profitability first and help humanity second.”

    Comment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”
  • Limited to life sciences

    “impressive to me, but sadly i feel a little misleading since this is only the data-science part of life sciences”

    Comment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

    “i think that this product would not be a fit for all given diversity of scientific tasks”

    Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

    “The connectors and skills are all just biology and pharma.”

    Comment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

What people said

33 of the 35 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“The moat is very limited. Harnesses aren't crazy hard to engineer.”

CriticizesComment from 25 Sep 2026 in “Yes, Claude can do nine loops”

“one or two companies holding the keys to "progress" for a monthly subscription price”

CriticizesComment from 25 Sep 2026 in “Yes, Claude can do nine loops”

“It's honestly harder - you have to do a lot of extra work to ensure your work is traceable.”

MixedComment from 24 Sep 2026 in “Claude discovers a novel enzyme system with CRISPR-like repeats”

“it is VERY good at finding patterns in the DNA around my binding sites”

RecommendsComment from 23 Sep 2026 in “Claude discovers a novel enzyme system with CRISPR-like repeats”

“came up pretty much with the same rules, built a report, and did the manual assessment”

RecommendsComment from 2 Sep 2026 in “No country for mediocre mathematicians”

“may have tons of potential if they expand to fields like economics and engineering”

RecommendsComment from 2 Jul 2026 in “Early look at Anthropic's Claude Science app for researchers”

“I actually believe Anthropic is moving in the right direction with this.”

RecommendsComment from 2 Jul 2026 in “Anthropic launches Claude Science: an AI workbench for scientists (2026)”

“$200/mo. Me, a scientist: copy-pasting into Claude and saying "I did the analysis."”

CriticizesComment from 2 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“On the one hand this is way better. On the other hand it's just good enough that your spot check will look good and your work will still contain hallucinations”

MixedComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“knocked out my analyses in minutes using command line tools like bcftools and scripting”

RecommendsComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“They are offering this free to igen students which is really cool”

RecommendsComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“i think that this product would not be a fit for all given diversity of scientific tasks”

CriticizesComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“Claude Science seemed to make very easy work of it.”

RecommendsComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“The built-in error recovery and tool orchestration could make it practical for real lab workflows, not just demos.”

RecommendsComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“Did it produce this absolute clanger of a visualisation that still proudly sits on top an anthropic blog post?”

CriticizesComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“it solved it in about a minute”

RecommendsComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“I like how this implies parsing PDFs is as hard as like protein folding”

CriticizesComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“it must be a massive headache for system administrators”

MixedComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“Doesn't seem like much value-add beyond pointing Claude code at org mode.”

CriticizesComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“It shocks me that Anthropic thought that this was a good thing, and says a lot about their research integrity (or lack thereof).”

CriticizesComment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Claude Science”

“it isnt just claude cowork especially with connection and abilities related to SPC clusters”

RecommendsComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“Claude science is meant to be used in the context of reproducible science research”

RecommendsComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“closed, proprietary ecosystems trying to build for-profit moats around research”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“That will be critical for traction within pharma R&D environments.”

RecommendsComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“Find out I need a different subscription. Cannot quit program (must force quit).”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“They forgot to include an example of prompt error on "cancer" with Fable in that "nice" video.”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“The connectors and skills are all just biology and pharma.”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“Shows how their priorities are for profitability first and help humanity second.”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“impressive to me, but sadly i feel a little misleading since this is only the data-science part of life sciences”

MixedComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“overrated packaged workspace to drain more usage”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“sycophantic, non-deterministic lying machine”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“a nice but verbose literature overview of my chosen topic that includes at least one hallucinated reference”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

“Making it easier to just pump out paper-mill publications is about the last thing science needs right now.”

CriticizesComment from 30 Jun 2026 in “Claude Science”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.