Cerebras Inference
Hacker ApprovedThe most recommended of 12 LLM inference APIs
People recommend it for extremely fast token generation that makes agents and coding feel near-instant, but many report harsh rate limits, capacity shortages and a limited, outdated model lineup.
People recommend it for extremely fast token generation that makes agents and coding feel near-instant, but many report harsh rate limits, capacity shortages and a limited, outdated model lineup.
160 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 109
- criticize it
- 51
- approval share
- 68%
Recommended in 13 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: recommended (month in progress)
Why it carries the badge
- 109 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 2.1 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 13 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Extremely fast token generation
“the speed is amazing and I can see the potential with having almost instant inference, but the models are so outdated at this point”
Comment from 25 Oct 2026 in “Cerebras Deploys Trillion-Parameter AI Models” “It caps output at 32K tokens so the 128K reasoning (the author budget) didn't fit. Cerebras speed is real though”
Comment from 1 Nov 2026 in “Memdoor: A team of 5 Qwen3.8-27B models beats Fable 5 on LiveCodeBench Hard” “With Cerebras it's not even worth switching tabs, because it'll finish the same task in like three seconds.”
Comment from 7 Nov 2025 in “You should write an agent” - Comment from 1 Mar 2026 in “Switch to Claude Without Starting Over”
- Comment from 1 Nov 2025 in “Show HN: Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing? (web app experiment)”
- Comment from 3 Jun 2026 in “Microsoft's MAI-Code-1-Flash Scores 51% SWE-Bench Pro with Just 5B Active Params”
- Comment from 8 Jun 2026 in “MiMo-v2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1T model with 1000 tokens per second”
- Comment from 23 Dec 2025 in “GLM-4.7: Advancing the Coding Capability”
- Comment from 19 Jan 2026 in “GLM-4.7-Flash”
- Comment from 13 Feb 2026 in “GPT‑5.3‑Codex‑Spark”
- Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic Coding Power, Now Open to All”
- Comment from 12 Jan 2026 in “Anthropic: Developing a Claude Code competitor using Claude Code is banned”
- Comment from 11 Feb 2026 in “GLM-5: From Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineering”
Speed transforms agentic coding workflows
“With Cerebras it's not even worth switching tabs, because it'll finish the same task in like three seconds.”
Comment from 7 Nov 2025 in “You should write an agent” “use cerebras with claude code and watch it generate millions of tokens in a few minutes”
Comment from 13 Feb 2026 in “Would you use a 10-ton truck to carry groceries to your car?” “Cerebras running Sol at 750 tokens per second, the harness "speed" becomes irrelevant”
Comment from 13 Aug 2026 in “Launch HN: Bullet (YC S26) – A Faster Coding Agent” - Comment from 4 Sep 2026 in “Qwen 3.8 27B available on Cerebras at 1500 tokens/s”
Good value for heavy usage
“Cheap enough for now, but of all the companies selling inference at a loss, Cerebras and Groq are probably losing the most per token”
Comment from 8 Nov 2025 in “GPT-OSS 120B Runs at 3000 tokens/sec on Cerebras” “most fixed cloud subscriptions will run out really quickly and will be insufficient (Cerebras being an exception)”
Comment from 10 Dec 2025 in “Mistral releases Devstral2 and Mistral Vibe CLI” “24M tokens per day for 50 USD seems like good value even with 128k context limitation”
Comment from 8 Nov 2025 in “Kimi K2 Thinking, a SOTA open-source trillion-parameter reasoning model” - Comment from 16 Apr 2026 in “Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: Agentic Coding Power, Now Open to All”
Generous subscription token allowances
“most fixed cloud subscriptions will run out really quickly and will be insufficient (Cerebras being an exception)”
Comment from 10 Dec 2025 in “Mistral releases Devstral2 and Mistral Vibe CLI” “I love Cerebras. I also love that they've started to scale rate limits to useful levels”
Comment from 15 Nov 2025 in “Why isn't everyone using Cerebras?” “24M tokens per day for 50 USD seems like good value even with 128k context limitation”
Comment from 8 Nov 2025 in “Kimi K2 Thinking, a SOTA open-source trillion-parameter reasoning model”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Aggressive rate limits, unreliable service
“they aggressively rate limit their APIs to the point where if you just run a single coding agent, your coding session will constantly stall out”
Comment from 25 Oct 2026 in “Cerebras Deploys Trillion-Parameter AI Models” “they aren't reliable at all, because they have to share limited resources dedicated to sales”
Comment from 25 Oct 2026 in “Cerebras Deploys Trillion-Parameter AI Models” “the $50/month or pay as you go was just not reliable. It would give service unavailable errors or falsely claim we were over our rate limit.”
Comment from 3 Mar 2026 in “Show HN: I built a sub-500ms latency voice agent from scratch” - Comment from 4 Sep 2026 in “Qwen 3.8 27B available on Cerebras at 1500 tokens/s”
Limited or outdated model selection
“the speed is amazing and I can see the potential with having almost instant inference, but the models are so outdated at this point”
Comment from 25 Oct 2026 in “Cerebras Deploys Trillion-Parameter AI Models” “They do offer API services to individual users... though with a set of models that makes it unlikely that you want to use it.”
Comment from 19 Aug 2026 in “Cerebras CS4” “I like Cerabras, but I really wish they would make more of their hosted models generally available.”
Comment from 8 Jul 2026 in “SWE-1.7 Reach Near GPT 5.5 and Opus Intelligence” - Comment from 2 Jun 2026 in “How the hell is Groq raising more money?”
Capacity constrained, enterprise gets priority
“They're pretty supply constrained right now though and their production costs seem prohibitive.”
Comment from 24 Jun 2026 in “OpenAI unveils its first custom chip, built by Broadcom” “they have more demand and commitments than their production and scaling capacity”
Comment from 25 Oct 2026 in “Cerebras Deploys Trillion-Parameter AI Models” “Cerebras are only serving kimi for dedicated endpoint customers; for that you need a >$5m annual deal with them”
Comment from 2 Jun 2026 in “How the hell is Groq raising more money?” - Comment from 4 Sep 2026 in “Qwen 3.8 27B available on Cerebras at 1500 tokens/s”
Context, output caps, no caching
“It caps output at 32K tokens so the 128K reasoning (the author budget) didn't fit. Cerebras speed is real though”
Comment from 1 Nov 2026 in “Memdoor: A team of 5 Qwen3.8-27B models beats Fable 5 on LiveCodeBench Hard” “Cerebras currently does not provide any discounts for prefix caching making its use for agentic workloads sqr(n_turns) more expensive.”
Comment from 8 Jun 2026 in “MiMo-v2.5-Pro-UltraSpeed: 1T model with 1000 tokens per second” “Their architecture recomputes every time so at 150k context every request will have to spend 1.5 min waiting”
Comment from 4 Sep 2026 in “Qwen 3.8 27B available on Cerebras at 1500 tokens/s”
Other LLM inference APIs people recommend
The four most recommended other LLM inference APIs, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
See all 12 LLM inference APIs, rankedWhat people said
40 of the 205 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“It caps output at 32K tokens so the 128K reasoning (the author budget) didn't fit. Cerebras speed is real though”
“Even with thinking off on Cerebras, a problem takes roughly 3 minutes and the 100 problems about 1.5 hours.”
“they aren't reliable at all, because they have to share limited resources dedicated to sales”
“they aggressively rate limit their APIs to the point where if you just run a single coding agent, your coding session will constantly stall out”
“the speed is amazing and I can see the potential with having almost instant inference, but the models are so outdated at this point”
“they have more demand and commitments than their production and scaling capacity”
“Completely unusable last time I tried it. You got hit with rate limits after the first few minutes of using it.”
“1500 tok/s is an impressive speed, and that speed is very important for agent tasks”
“Their architecture recomputes every time so at 150k context every request will have to spend 1.5 min waiting”
“Cerebras is super constrained on capacity right now, all the support is going to enterprise customers.”
“They do offer API services to individual users... though with a set of models that makes it unlikely that you want to use it.”
“Cerebras running Sol at 750 tokens per second, the harness "speed" becomes irrelevant”
“I like Cerabras, but I really wish they would make more of their hosted models generally available.”
“They're pretty supply constrained right now though and their production costs seem prohibitive.”
“using Cerebras at ~2k tokens/s, with very low latency is like a vision into the future”
“Cerebras currently does not provide any discounts for prefix caching making its use for agentic workloads sqr(n_turns) more expensive.”
“watching it slam out several entire screens of thinking/reasoning per second is amazing”
“The best work in this area is memory-integrated Big-Ass-Die or Big-Ass-Chiplet solutions like Cerebras”
“Cerebras are only serving kimi for dedicated endpoint customers; for that you need a >$5m annual deal with them”
“Much harder to catch issues when it is moving a million miles an hour and then it is too late and it has already spent a ton of tokens.”
“Can somebody explain why there’s so little apparent progress here despite the theoretically massive advantage?”
“Cerebras running Qwen 3 235B Instruct at 1.4k tps for cheaper than Claude Haiku”
“the technology is very promising just like Cerebras, but we need to see whether they are able to keep up”
“We already have Groq, Celebras and AWS Bedrock and others in the inference of open models space”
“the $50/month or pay as you go was just not reliable. It would give service unavailable errors or falsely claim we were over our rate limit.”
“I use them heavily in production because OSS 120B on Groq/Cerebras is one of the fastest models available”
“It’s incredible to run a strong model at interactive latencies for whole results.”
“use cerebras with claude code and watch it generate millions of tokens in a few minutes”
“I still enjoy using GLM 4.7 on Cerebras because of the speed you can get there”
“Vertex, Groq, Cerebras, etc. all do not rely on GPUs for much or all of their inference and are all the better for it.”
“seeing two pages of written content output in the literal blink of an eye is magical”
“Cerebras, who get silly fast token generation, which enables interesting cases”
“the ability to run them at 1k tokens per second on Cerebras would be a massive benefit”
“And while the Cerebras service is pretty okay, their website otherwise kinda sucks - and yet you can find clear info!”
“most fixed cloud subscriptions will run out really quickly and will be insufficient (Cerebras being an exception)”
“I love Cerebras. I also love that they've started to scale rate limits to useful levels”
“Cheap enough for now, but of all the companies selling inference at a loss, Cerebras and Groq are probably losing the most per token”
“24M tokens per day for 50 USD seems like good value even with 128k context limitation”
“With Cerebras it's not even worth switching tabs, because it'll finish the same task in like three seconds.”
“They are _really_ fast, and they might make the whole thing actually viable in terms of speed.”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.