Desk & home office · calculator
Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition
People recommend it for its handcrafted lacquer look and premium feel as a keepsake, though critics say it is an average calculator for the price.
Summarized from 23 comments.
People recommend it for its handcrafted lacquer look and premium feel as a keepsake, though critics say it is an average calculator for the price.
- recommend
- 16
- criticize
- 7
- months recommended
- 1 of 13
Why people love it
Handcrafted look and craftsmanship · 3
The attraction here is surely celebrating the craftsmanship and the story / history behind the product
May 2026 · commentthe video showed a man working on it who cared
May 2026 · commentthis is something unique handcrafted.
May 2026 · commentLooks nice, a keeper for life · 2
I saw it and I thought this looks really nice and I could buy one and have it for life
May 2026 · commentThis looks awesome! I would buy it instantly, if it would be a scientific calculator, ideally with RPN.
May 2026 · commentUnique and premium, unlike the status quo · 2
That is what Apple needs, a Lacquer edition iProduct
May 2026 · commentit exists in a different level than the status quo
May 2026 · commentCalculator itself is pretty nice · 2
the calculator is pretty nice too
May 2026 · commentBut still buy the calculator :)
May 2026 · comment
What people warn about
Not better than regular calculators · 3
Utility-wise for the cost, it's not outstanding compared to regular calculators.
May 2026 · commenttechnically there is nothing special here, just the physical appearance/build
May 2026 · commentthey don't need a very average calculator in a premium case
May 2026 · commentLacquer finish looks tacky or lackluster · 3
it still looks rather tacky to me, mostly because of its lacquered finish
May 2026 · commentthe deep lacquer luster a bit lackluster
May 2026 · commentIs it me or it just doesn't look that amazing?
May 2026 · commentLacks scientific functions and RPN · 2
This looks awesome! I would buy it instantly, if it would be a scientific calculator, ideally with RPN.
May 2026 · commentIt isn't going to cut it if your working outside of that domain.
May 2026 · comment
What hackers pick instead
- HP 15COwners praise its tactile keys, battery life and durability, with a median of 41 years of use. Critics say the reissues don't match the original's keys, display or labeling.24recommend
- Casio calculatorPeople recommend Casio calculators for being cheap, durable and simple enough for school exams and everyday math. Critics say the functions are limited and cannot store formulas or programs.14recommend
- SwissMicros DM42nPeople recommend it as a stack-based RPN calculator that feels good to use and is built to last. The most common caveat is small keys.13recommend
- SwissMicros R47 RPN calculatorRecommended as a physical RPN calculator with high-end build, screen and instant on/off, and engineering people praise. Critics call it backward-looking and too expensive.11recommend
- HP 42S calculatorOwners recommend the HP 42S for its satisfying tactile buttons and long life, with many reporting decades of reliable use. Battery replacement is the common caveat.8recommend
Every quote
The 20 most detailed of 23 comments. Each links to the original.
This looks awesome! I would buy it instantly, if it would be a scientific calculator, ideally with RPN.
Mixed · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
The attraction here is surely celebrating the craftsmanship and the story / history behind the product
Recommends · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
I saw it and I thought this looks really nice and I could buy one and have it for life
Mixed · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
it still looks rather tacky to me, mostly because of its lacquered finish
Mixed · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
It isn't going to cut it if your working outside of that domain.
Mixed · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
That is what Apple needs, a Lacquer edition iProduct
Recommends · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
it exists in a different level than the status quo
Recommends · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
the video showed a man working on it who cared
Recommends · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
this is something unique handcrafted.
Recommends · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
the calculator is pretty nice too
Recommends · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
But still buy the calculator :)
Recommends · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
Utility-wise for the cost, it's not outstanding compared to regular calculators.
Criticizes · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
technically there is nothing special here, just the physical appearance/build
Criticizes · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
they don't need a very average calculator in a premium case
Criticizes · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
Is it me or it just doesn't look that amazing?
Criticizes · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
the deep lacquer luster a bit lackluster
Criticizes · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
the keycaps are double-shot, have scissor switches, and 3-key rollover
Recommends · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
I have never seen this calculator myself
Mixed · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
3-key rollover instead of n-key rollover??
Criticizes · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
This calculator, hard pass for me.
Criticizes · May 2026 · in “Casio S100X Japanese Lacquer Edition (JP Page Only)”
Counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, Nov 2025 to Nov 2026. How we count · Report a mistake