Hacker ApprovedDepartments

Amazon RDS

Shares rank 11 of 15 managed databases by recommenders

People recommend it as a near zero-maintenance managed database with automatic recovery, so teams avoid running their own; critics find it costly, slower than self-hosting, and restrictive.

People recommend it as a near zero-maintenance managed database with automatic recovery, so teams avoid running their own; critics find it costly, slower than self-hosting, and restrictive.

15 people gave an opinion

recommend it
6
criticize it
9
approval share
40%
Each figure is one person. RecommendsCriticizes

Recommended in 5 of 13 months

  1. November 2025: recommended
  2. December 2025: recommended
  3. January 2026: recommended
  4. February 2026: not recommended
  5. March 2026: not recommended
  6. April 2026: not recommended
  7. May 2026: recommended
  8. June 2026: not recommended
  9. July 2026: not recommended
  10. August 2026: not recommended
  11. September 2026: recommended
  12. October 2026: not recommended
  13. November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)

Why it doesn’t carry the badge

  • 6 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
  • 0.6 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
  • Recommended in 5 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.

The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works

What people say about it

The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.

Why people recommend it

Each mark is one comment

  • Little database maintenance needed

    “RDS + EKS for a couple hundred a month is an amazing deal for what is essentially zero maintenance application hosting”

    Comment from 19 Nov 2025 in “A $1k AWS mistake”

    “I have no intention of managing my own DB and the insanity that comes with that.”

    Comment from 26 Jan 2026 in “You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers”

What people warn about

Each mark is one comment

  • Weaker performance than self-hosted

    “AWS RDS is about 10x more expensive than bare metal with maybe 1/4th the disk performance”

    Comment from 27 Jan 2026 in “France Aiming to Replace Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, etc.”

    “"Tuned" AWS instance is not impressive comparing it with”

    Comment from 7 Jul 2026 in “PostgreSQL Benchmark: AWS RDS vs. Self-Hosted on Hetzner (2026)”

    “Uses t4 burst instances in AWS, shared CPU in Hetzner.”

    Comment from 7 Jul 2026 in “PostgreSQL Benchmark: AWS RDS vs. Self-Hosted on Hetzner (2026)”
  • Limits database design and extensions

    “they limit your options for how you want to design your database architecture”

    Comment from 20 Dec 2025 in “Go ahead, self-host Postgres”

    “you're not able to use the extensions you want”

    Comment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Pgrx: Build Postgres Extensions with Rust”

Other managed databases people recommend

The four most recommended other managed databases, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.

Amazon RDS compared with 4 alternatives
ProductRecommendCriticizeApprovalMonthsOwnedBadge
Amazon RDS504354%11——
Neon Postgres481083%12—Approved
DynamoDB463160%11——
Cloudflare D1363055%10——
Amazon RDSThis page6940%5——
See all 15 managed databases, ranked

What people said

15 of the 16 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.

“Dev or Staging should be end to end testing against AWS RDS”

RecommendsComment from 28 Sep 2026 in “Fakecloud: Local AWS cloud emulator for integration tests”

“Unless this use case is warned against in migration notes, I would think they ought to.”

CriticizesComment from 29 Aug 2026 in “A safe MySQL upgrade that wasn't so safe”

“Uses t4 burst instances in AWS, shared CPU in Hetzner.”

CriticizesComment from 7 Jul 2026 in “PostgreSQL Benchmark: AWS RDS vs. Self-Hosted on Hetzner (2026)”

“"Tuned" AWS instance is not impressive comparing it with”

CriticizesComment from 7 Jul 2026 in “PostgreSQL Benchmark: AWS RDS vs. Self-Hosted on Hetzner (2026)”

“just using fargate or rds whatever”

RecommendsComment from 10 May 2026 in “I returned to AWS, and was reminded why I left”

“you're not able to use the extensions you want”

CriticizesComment from 28 Apr 2026 in “Pgrx: Build Postgres Extensions with Rust”

“all of the magic "I don't have to think about it" stuff dies with the DB.”

CriticizesComment from 26 Apr 2026 in “An AI agent deleted our production database. The agent's confession is below”

“AWS RDS is about 10x more expensive than bare metal with maybe 1/4th the disk performance”

CriticizesComment from 27 Jan 2026 in “France Aiming to Replace Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, etc.”

“I just migrated this weekend our database from AWS RDS to a Hetzner VPS”

CriticizesComment from 26 Jan 2026 in “France Aiming to Replace Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, etc.”

“I have no intention of managing my own DB and the insanity that comes with that.”

RecommendsComment from 26 Jan 2026 in “You can just port things to Cloudflare Workers”

“I moved from AWS RDS to ScaleWay RDS”

CriticizesComment from 20 Dec 2025 in “Go ahead, self-host Postgres”

“they limit your options for how you want to design your database architecture”

CriticizesComment from 20 Dec 2025 in “Go ahead, self-host Postgres”

“AWS support couldn't determine what was wrong with an RDS cluster and advised us to "try restarting it"”

MixedComment from 20 Dec 2025 in “Go ahead, self-host Postgres”

“RDS + EKS for a couple hundred a month is an amazing deal for what is essentially zero maintenance application hosting”

RecommendsComment from 19 Nov 2025 in “A $1k AWS mistake”

“recovery is generally automatic within minutes”

RecommendsComment from 19 Nov 2025 in “A $1k AWS mistake”

Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.