arXiv
Hacker ApprovedThe most recommended of 6 academic paper archives
People recommend it as the free, fast place to read and publish preprints, often ahead of journal versions, with timestamps and stable IDs. Critics note that anyone can post almost anything with little content review.
People recommend it as the free, fast place to read and publish preprints, often ahead of journal versions, with timestamps and stable IDs. Critics note that anyone can post almost anything with little content review.
121 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 83
- criticize it
- 38
- approval share
- 69%
Recommended in 11 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: recommended
- March 2026: recommended
- April 2026: recommended
- May 2026: recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: not recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it carries the badge
- 83 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 2.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, met.
- Recommended in 11 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Free access to preprints
“almost all research in math, cs, and physics, are put on arxiv, where you can download the source code (.tex) as well as get an HTML render.”
Comment from 14 Sep 2026 in “A beginning for mathematics” “ArXiv preprints are much more widely read than the journals' version of articles, and they go up essentially as soon as they're written.”
Comment from 28 Jul 2026 in “Many "serious" mathematicians are aghast” “It’s good for getting free access to preprints which are often close enough to the paywalled real papers in journals.”
Comment from 24 Sep 2026 in “ArXiv receives multiyear commitments to support it as an independent nonprofit” - Comment from 24 Sep 2026 in “ArXiv receives multiyear commitments to support it as an independent nonprofit”
- Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “ArXiv's Next Chapter”
Central hub for research
“In math and physics all the best stuff is on the arxiv and the general level is well above the level of most journals.”
Comment from 7 Sep 2026 in “Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddings” “the arxiv is the default place to publish and where one goes to find the best and most current work”
Comment from 9 Sep 2026 in “Harnessing the Universal Geometry of Embeddings” “if not for arxiv and huggingface, the field of ML would be nowhere near where it is today”
Comment from 24 Sep 2026 in “ArXiv receives multiyear commitments to support it as an independent nonprofit” - Comment from 2 Oct 2026 in “ArXiv's Updated Rate Limit Policy”
Stable archive and timestamps
“it gives 1) a timestamp, 2) a standardized citable ID, and 3) stable hosting of the pdf”
Comment from 20 Mar 2026 in “ArXiv Declares Independence from Cornell” “The main reason for Arxiv's existence is the timestamping and the easy referencing.”
Comment from 1 Oct 2026 in “ArXiv's Updated Rate Limit Policy” “it serves as a stable archive that won't be plagued by link rot or paywalls”
Comment from 24 Sep 2026 in “ArXiv receives multiyear commitments to support it as an independent nonprofit” - Comment from 6 Oct 2026 in “Sharing AI progress in mathematics”
Useful data and downloadable source
“almost all research in math, cs, and physics, are put on arxiv, where you can download the source code (.tex) as well as get an HTML render.”
Comment from 14 Sep 2026 in “A beginning for mathematics” “one of the best free academic data sources — structured Atom feed with full abstracts, authors, categories, and publication dates”
Comment from 20 Mar 2026 in “ArXiv Declares Independence from Cornell” “For anyone like me who finds theory a little dense, you can prepend "quick" to an arxiv link to get a blogpost-style summary”
Comment from 2 Sep 2026 in “The Emergent Symbolic Structure of Artificial Neural Networks”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Low-quality or promotional papers
“saw a lot of crap published there (primarily for promotion/visa purposes) so it kind of took the shine out of the service for me”
Comment from 24 Sep 2026 in “ArXiv receives multiyear commitments to support it as an independent nonprofit” “I've been surprised as how bad and obviously grifty some of the documents I've seen on arXiv have become lately.”
Comment from 20 Mar 2026 in “ArXiv Declares Independence from Cornell” “Uploading to arXiV is becoming a favorite tactic from companies trying to look impressive for investors.”
Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to do” - Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “ArXiv's Next Chapter”
Little content review
“Basically ~anyone can post ~anything to it. They do spam moderation but no content review.”
Comment from 4 May 2026 in “Agentic Coding Is a Trap” “Anyone can put anything on arxiv, it counts the same as printing it on tissue paper.”
Comment from 12 Sep 2026 in “Navier-Stokes Announcement” “It's not full-open access, one can get effectively banned there for reasons not related to quality of submission.”
Comment from 27 Mar 2026 in “CERN to host Europe's flagship open access publishing platform” Not a credible citation source
“arXiV is not considered a credible citation source since anyone can publish anything.”
Comment from 4 Mar 2026 in “The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to do” “Arxiv is a blog. Your paper is a blog post which is just as citable and as peer reviewed as blogspot.”
Comment from 24 Sep 2026 in “ArXiv receives multiyear commitments to support it as an independent nonprofit”
Other academic paper archives people recommend
The four most recommended other academic paper archives, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| arXivThis page | 83 | 38 | 69% | 11 | — | Approved |
| Sci-Hub | 17 | 3 | 85% | 9 | — | Approved |
| Zenodo | 9 | 2 | 82% | 5 | — | — |
| ACM Digital Library | 9 | 17 | 35% | 4 | — | — |
| JSTOR | 7 | 4 | 64% | 4 | — | — |
What people said
40 of the 138 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“switch to the arXiv model everywhere: let anyone publish with a bare minimum of moderation”
“GitHub is a significantly worse place to store important results than Arxiv”
“someone (arxiv) takes an interest in the commons (scientific paper publishing) and curates/controls a segment of it, actively preventing abuse.”
“Arxiv is the principal forum for publishing mathematics research of quality.”
“The main reason for Arxiv's existence is the timestamping and the easy referencing.”
“the AI reaearchers who got their careers started on arxiv should chip in to support the site”
“Arxiv is a blog. Your paper is a blog post which is just as citable and as peer reviewed as blogspot.”
“if not for arxiv and huggingface, the field of ML would be nowhere near where it is today”
“I don't think the intention nor the value comes from just haphazardously reading through everything in some section.”
“they're free instead of locked behind a multi-thousand dollar/year paywall”
“it serves as a stable archive that won't be plagued by link rot or paywalls”
“It’s good for getting free access to preprints which are often close enough to the paywalled real papers in journals.”
“saw a lot of crap published there (primarily for promotion/visa purposes) so it kind of took the shine out of the service for me”
“almost all research in math, cs, and physics, are put on arxiv, where you can download the source code (.tex) as well as get an HTML render.”
“Anyone can put anything on arxiv, it counts the same as printing it on tissue paper.”
“the arxiv is the default place to publish and where one goes to find the best and most current work”
“ArXiv does have moderators and endorsers in each area, although they are usually light-touch”
“In math and physics all the best stuff is on the arxiv and the general level is well above the level of most journals.”
“For anyone like me who finds theory a little dense, you can prepend "quick" to an arxiv link to get a blogpost-style summary”
“ArXiv preprints are much more widely read than the journals' version of articles, and they go up essentially as soon as they're written.”
“they also keep the papers as a pre-edited, free version of the peer reviewed equivalent”
“I have always liked arXiv's articles on information science and library science.”
“It's a useful tool. But its "value" is about the same as a github repo with your pdf.”
“a substantial quantity of papers on arXiv are just blog posts in a LaTeX trench coat”
“It allows non-scientists like me to access high-quality papers anytime.”
“Basically ~anyone can post ~anything to it. They do spam moderation but no content review.”
“It's not full-open access, one can get effectively banned there for reasons not related to quality of submission.”
“freely publishing, free access, and a global, vigorous discussion across a wide range of platforms”
“one of the best free academic data sources — structured Atom feed with full abstracts, authors, categories, and publication dates”
“I've been surprised as how bad and obviously grifty some of the documents I've seen on arXiv have become lately.”
“it gives 1) a timestamp, 2) a standardized citable ID, and 3) stable hosting of the pdf”
“Its reasonable to have a tradeoff here to avoid cranks and now AI psychosis slop.”
“It is pretty open (the stories where a preprint was rejected or delayed unreasonably are extremely rare).”
“Uploading to arXiV is becoming a favorite tactic from companies trying to look impressive for investors.”
“arXiV is not considered a credible citation source since anyone can publish anything.”
“the problem is essentially solved by virtue of having arxiv.org strongly embedded into the culture”
“it's never been that difficult to find most papers either on arxiv or the author's website”
“The arXiv and the derivative preprint repositories (e.g., bioRxiv) are other good initiatives.”
“do the auto-generated HTML files contain nothing more than a sea of divs dressed with a billion classes?”
“Great move by arXiv—clear standards for reviews and position papers are crucial in fast-moving areas”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.