# arXiv 83 Hacker News commenters recommended arXiv and 38 criticized it, November 2025 to November 2026. It was recommended in 11 of 13 months. It meets the Hacker Approved badge rule. **Verdict:** People recommend it as the free, fast place to read and publish preprints, often ahead of journal versions, with timestamps and stable IDs. Critics note that anyone can post almost anything with little content review. ## Why people recommend it - Free access to preprints (5 comments): "almost all research in math, cs, and physics, are put on arxiv, where you can download the source code (.tex) as well as get an HTML render." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49703556)) "ArXiv preprints are much more widely read than the journals' version of articles, and they go up essentially as soon as they're written." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49084468)) "It’s good for getting free access to preprints which are often close enough to the paywalled real papers in journals." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49824675)) - Central hub for research (4 comments): "In math and physics all the best stuff is on the arxiv and the general level is well above the level of most journals." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49594336)) "the arxiv is the default place to publish and where one goes to find the best and most current work" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49621052)) "if not for arxiv and huggingface, the field of ML would be nowhere near where it is today" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49827369)) - Stable archive and timestamps (4 comments): "it gives 1) a timestamp, 2) a standardized citable ID, and 3) stable hosting of the pdf" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47453448)) "The main reason for Arxiv's existence is the timestamping and the easy referencing." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49928285)) "it serves as a stable archive that won't be plagued by link rot or paywalls" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49824703)) - Useful data and downloadable source (3 comments): "almost all research in math, cs, and physics, are put on arxiv, where you can download the source code (.tex) as well as get an HTML render." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49703556)) "one of the best free academic data sources — structured Atom feed with full abstracts, authors, categories, and publication dates" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47454492)) "For anyone like me who finds theory a little dense, you can prepend "quick" to an arxiv link to get a blogpost-style summary" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49536908)) ## What people warn about - Low-quality or promotional papers (4 comments): "saw a lot of crap published there (primarily for promotion/visa purposes) so it kind of took the shine out of the service for me" ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49824641)) "I've been surprised as how bad and obviously grifty some of the documents I've seen on arXiv have become lately." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47454243)) "Uploading to arXiV is becoming a favorite tactic from companies trying to look impressive for investors." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47250212)) - Little content review (3 comments): "Basically ~anyone can post ~anything to it. They do spam moderation but no content review." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48009735)) "Anyone can put anything on arxiv, it counts the same as printing it on tissue paper." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49670580)) "It's not full-open access, one can get effectively banned there for reasons not related to quality of submission." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540795)) - Not a credible citation source (2 comments): "arXiV is not considered a credible citation source since anyone can publish anything." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47249203)) "Arxiv is a blog. Your paper is a blog post which is just as citable and as peer reviewed as blogspot." ([source](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49832956)) ## Alternatives hackers recommend - [Sci-Hub](https://hackerapproved.com/p/sci-hub.md): 17 recommend - [Zenodo](https://hackerapproved.com/p/zenodo.md): 9 recommend - [ACM Digital Library](https://hackerapproved.com/p/acm-digital-library.md): 9 recommend - [JSTOR](https://hackerapproved.com/p/jstor.md): 7 recommend - [HAL (hal.science)](https://hackerapproved.com/p/hal.md): 7 recommend ## Where to get it - [Visit the official site](https://arxiv.org/) ## Cite as Hacker Approved, "arXiv", https://hackerapproved.com/p/arxiv/ (counts from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026).