Apple Private Cloud Compute
Cloud compute service in Privacy & security
People praise its verifiable privacy design, which aims to stop Apple from reading user data sent to its servers. Critics say it still requires trusting Apple's word and audits.
People praise its verifiable privacy design, which aims to stop Apple from reading user data sent to its servers. Critics say it still requires trusting Apple's word and audits.
41 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 23
- criticize it
- 18
- approval share
- 56%
Recommended in 8 of 13 months
- November 2025: recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: recommended
- February 2026: not recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: not recommended
- May 2026: not recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: recommended
- September 2026: recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 23 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, met.
- 1.2 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 8 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Strong verifiable privacy design
“Apple has some impressive privacy technology for Apple Intelligence - including significant open source disclosure for public verification.”
Comment from 21 Sep 2026 in “Turn off and restrict access to Apple Intelligence features on Mac” “Apple has definitely gone the furthest in terms of verifiably ensuring that requests and responses are not misusable by Apple”
Comment from 14 Jul 2026 in “Codex starts encrypting prompts, uses ciphertext for inference instead” “they have put a gargantuan amount of work into PCC to uphold the claims they make about its privacy”
Comment from 13 Oct 2026 in “New Apple TV 4K” - Comment from 14 Jun 2026 in “Bring Siri AI to EU iPhone Users Safely”
- Comment from 10 Jun 2026 in “Apple decided not to roll out Siri in EU after denied request for exemption”
- Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Apple decided not to roll out Siri in EU after denied request for exemption”
Open source components for verification
“Apple has some impressive privacy technology for Apple Intelligence - including significant open source disclosure for public verification.”
Comment from 21 Sep 2026 in “Turn off and restrict access to Apple Intelligence features on Mac” “given Apple's surprising relative openness for how they implement their privacy products”
Comment from 1 Jul 2026 in “Asahi Linux 7.1 Progress Report” “They do this by allowing you to download all of the components”
Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models” - Comment from 20 Aug 2026 in “Private Cloud Compute Security Guide”
Good architecture and security engineering
“Apple PCC is using completely mad and paranoid amounts of security down to hardware and firmware level”
Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Apple decided not to roll out Siri in EU after denied request for exemption” “the private cloud compute stuff of Apple is really interesting architecure wise”
Comment from 5 Nov 2025 in “Apple nears $1B Google deal for custom Gemini model to power Siri” “it's a well-thought-out system under those constraints”
Comment from 27 Jul 2026 in “Apple Will 'Watch Everything Burn' When the AI Bubble Bursts” - Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models”
Useful model for private AI
“PCC seemed like the only viable option for a pro-AI, yet pro-privacy person such as myself”
Comment from 1 Dec 2025 in “John Giannandrea to retire from Apple” “PCC is quite good, about as close to private remote compute we can get without doing HME.”
Comment from 16 Sep 2026 in “Apple Reference Image: A New Approach for Verified Photography” “we need to move toward assurances of privacy (eg. verifiable Private Cloud Compute model)”
Comment from 27 Nov 2025 in “Protect Public School Students from Surveillance of Off-Campus Speech”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Still requires trusting Apple
“It works for Apple (well enough) because of the high trust we place in their own physical controls”
Comment from 6 Nov 2025 in “Open Source Implementation of Apple's Private Compute Cloud” “the PCC root keys are still signed by Apple which requires you to trust Apple”
Comment from 8 Jun 2026 in “Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models” “Of course, at that point it depends on how much you trust their PCC.”
Comment from 22 Sep 2026 in “Spymarks, not Watermarks” - Comment from 7 Nov 2025 in “Open Source Implementation of Apple's Private Compute Cloud”
Audit access and claims disputed
“Apparently their "Verifiable Transparency" claim just means Apple invited unnamed outside security experts and independent researchers”
Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Apple decided not to roll out Siri in EU after denied request for exemption” “It's a form of theater, you have to be hand-selected to perform the audit that Apple promised.”
Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Apple decided not to roll out Siri in EU after denied request for exemption” “That page objectively proves that Apple can't be trusted and breaks their promises.”
Comment from 9 Jun 2026 in “Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models” Unclear real-world usage and value
“That's nice... in theory. Like it could be cool, and useful... but like what would I actually run on it if I'm not a spammer?”
Comment from 6 Nov 2025 in “Open Source Implementation of Apple's Private Compute Cloud” “They invested a ton in their Private Cloud Compute though, but are barely using their capacity.”
Comment from 3 Apr 2026 in “Good ideas do not need lots of lies in order to gain public acceptance”
What people said
40 of the 53 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“Private Cloud Compute goes to great lengths to prove it can't violate your privacy.”
“they have put a gargantuan amount of work into PCC to uphold the claims they make about its privacy”
“Of course, at that point it depends on how much you trust their PCC.”
“Apple has some impressive privacy technology for Apple Intelligence - including significant open source disclosure for public verification.”
“PCC is quite good, about as close to private remote compute we can get without doing HME.”
“the root of trust stays inside Apple's Private Cloud Compute”
“I have real respect for Apple's "Private Cloud Compute" architecture”
“they are the only one that appears to give a crap about privacy at all”
“Just the stated guarantees are impressive”
“it's a well-thought-out system under those constraints”
“I have absolutely 0 reasons to believe Apple Private Cloud is not a data extraction mechanism for the gullible.”
“The speed with which Apple Intelligence worked back when it actually used Apple's own PCC and not Google's cloud was still much higher than could be achieved with anything they sold to customers.”
“Apple has definitely gone the furthest in terms of verifiably ensuring that requests and responses are not misusable by Apple”
“given Apple's surprising relative openness for how they implement their privacy products”
“full confidentiality is guaranteed that even Apple itself is not able to access user data”
“It's state of the art private compute according to actual experts”
“It's a form of theater, you have to be hand-selected to perform the audit that Apple promised.”
“Apparently their "Verifiable Transparency" claim just means Apple invited unnamed outside security experts and independent researchers”
“Apple PCC has been independently audited to be ultra secure.”
“Apple PCC is using completely mad and paranoid amounts of security down to hardware and firmware level”
“That seems to conflict with the recent security blog that says they are using Google Cloud infra and NVIDIA GPUs with PCC now”
“Personally I think their approach is fascinating.”
“They do this by allowing you to download all of the components”
“the point of PCC is so you know somebody isn't snooping on your information when you send it to the servers”
“That page objectively proves that Apple can't be trusted and breaks their promises.”
“the PCC root keys are still signed by Apple which requires you to trust Apple”
“Yes, the "Apple needs to look at your data to do this, but we don't have any way to look at the data if we wanted to"”
“Verifiable privacy promise”
“They invested a ton in their Private Cloud Compute though, but are barely using their capacity.”
“The fact that their phone security was poor enough for someone to get killed and thousands of others exposed”
“which is actually pretty cool since it lets you use Somebody Else's Computer with some assurance that they aren't spying on you”
“I just think it is useful that Apple is trying something along those lines”
“PCC seemed like the only viable option for a pro-AI, yet pro-privacy person such as myself”
“we need to move toward assurances of privacy (eg. verifiable Private Cloud Compute model)”
“We even seemingly have to trust them that this magic hardware has the properties they claim it does.”
“they gave all the data to China for Chinese users”
“It works for Apple (well enough) because of the high trust we place in their own physical controls”
“Really nice release. Excited to see this out in the wild and hopeful more companies leverage this for better end user privacy.”
“That's nice... in theory. Like it could be cool, and useful... but like what would I actually run on it if I'm not a spammer?”
“the private cloud compute stuff of Apple is really interesting architecure wise”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.