All-In Podcast
Shares rank 25 of 42 podcasts by recommenders
People recommend it for insider palace intrigue, arguably privileged access to information, and entertainment. Critics say it has become a partisan, pro-Trump podcast with self-serving hosts.
People recommend it for insider palace intrigue, arguably privileged access to information, and entertainment. Critics say it has become a partisan, pro-Trump podcast with self-serving hosts.
18 people gave an opinion
- recommend it
- 6
- criticize it
- 12
- approval share
- 33%
Recommended in 4 of 13 months
- November 2025: not recommended
- December 2025: recommended
- January 2026: not recommended
- February 2026: not recommended
- March 2026: not recommended
- April 2026: not recommended
- May 2026: not recommended
- June 2026: recommended
- July 2026: recommended
- August 2026: not recommended
- September 2026: not recommended
- October 2026: recommended
- November 2026: not recommended (month in progress)
Why it doesn’t carry the badge
- 6 people recommend itNeeds 10 or more, not met.
- 0.5 recommenders for every criticNeeds 2 to 1 or better, not met.
- Recommended in 4 of 13 monthsNeeds 4 or more, met.
The same three rules apply to every product, and the badge can’t be bought. How the badge works
What people say about it
The reasons people give, with the number of comments that give each one. Open a reason to read what they said.
Why people recommend it
Each mark is one comment
Palace intrigue and insider access
“They have some value in that they have palace intrigue + arguably asymetric access to information.”
Comment from 15 Jun 2026 in “What the Fuck Happened to Nerds” “Because they're bad information sources. They're terrific entertainment.”
Comment from 5 Jun 2026 in “SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P” Terrific entertainment
“Because they're bad information sources. They're terrific entertainment.”
Comment from 5 Jun 2026 in “SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P” Interesting suggestions
“I found what they suggested pretty interesting”
Comment from 24 Jul 2026 in “OpenAI's accidental cyberattack against Hugging Face is science fiction”
What people warn about
Each mark is one comment
Partisan, pro-Trump MAGA slant
“since two of the 'besties' joined Team Trump, it has become clear to me just how self serving they are”
Comment from 28 Feb 2026 in “Techno‑Feudal Elite Are Attempting to Build a Twenty‑First‑Century Fascist State” “They sold out all credibility for political wins for wanna-be fascists.”
Comment from 23 Dec 2025 in “How did DOGE disrupt so much while saving so little?” “The All In podcast is basically a MAGA podcast now.”
Comment from 22 Jan 2026 in “Palantir, Meta, OpenAI Execs Appointed Lieutenant Colonels in US Army” - Comment from 3 Feb 2026 in “The Ministry of Propaganda”
Self-serving hosts profiting from access
“since two of the 'besties' joined Team Trump, it has become clear to me just how self serving they are”
Comment from 28 Feb 2026 in “Techno‑Feudal Elite Are Attempting to Build a Twenty‑First‑Century Fascist State” “now those four guys mostly lie (my opinion) in ways to profit themselves and their rich friends”
Comment from 18 May 2026 in “Eric Schmidt booed during graduation speech about AI” Gloating over harm to workers
“these guys started gloating with glee about all the breakage that Musk and Trump were causing”
Comment from 15 Jun 2026 in “David Sacks on Anthropic export control” “All round glee on that podcast with things that negatively impact the working classes”
Comment from 23 Dec 2025 in “Why were all stories about the '60 minutes' leak removed from HN?” Bragging, gushing, promotional tone
“It is completely censored now with only gushing AI-written one-liner posts.”
Comment from 17 Aug 2026 in “David Sacks on X: Some thoughts on Dario's post” “too much bragging in general, and too much politics”
Comment from 7 May 2026 in “David Sacks crashed and burned in the White House”
Other podcasts people recommend
The four most recommended other podcasts, with the same counts for each, so you can compare like for like. The tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs.
| Product | Recommend | Criticize | Approval | Months | Owned | Badge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dwarkesh Podcast | 29 | 8 | 78% | 9 | — | Approved |
| Oxide and Friends | 26 | 3 | 90% | 10 | — | Approved |
| Acquired podcast | 25 | 0 | 100% | 11 | — | Approved |
| Behind the Bastards podcast | 18 | 1 | 95% | 11 | — | Approved |
| All-In PodcastThis page | 6 | 12 | 33% | 4 | — | — |
What people said
20 of the 22 comments that mention it, newest first. Each links to the original comment.
“The all-in podcast should be a study object for the most effective propaganda in history.”
“It is completely censored now with only gushing AI-written one-liner posts.”
“I found what they suggested pretty interesting”
“I'll use the All-in podcast as a perfect example of the type of person described.”
“They have some value in that they have palace intrigue + arguably asymetric access to information.”
“these guys started gloating with glee about all the breakage that Musk and Trump were causing”
“Because they're bad information sources. They're terrific entertainment.”
“now those four guys mostly lie (my opinion) in ways to profit themselves and their rich friends”
“too much bragging in general, and too much politics”
“Especially when they have guests on and they're exactly like the regulars.”
“shame on all the podcasters and VCs who advertised those abominable 'platforms'”
“since two of the 'besties' joined Team Trump, it has become clear to me just how self serving they are”
“There is a reason I stopped listening to All-In Podcast.”
“The All In podcast is a MAGA podcast now.”
“the closest thing to that is to tune in their All_in podcast weekly”
“The All In podcast is basically a MAGA podcast now.”
“the all-in podcast has only positive comments in suspiciously perfect English”
“They sold out all credibility for political wins for wanna-be fascists.”
“All round glee on that podcast with things that negatively impact the working classes”
“His "arguments" on the All-In podcast are always purely persuasive/emotional and never substantiated by fact or logic.”
Counts come from 1,795,640 Hacker News comments, November 2025 to November 2026. How we count. Report a mistake.