Hacker ApprovedDepartments

The best self-hosted file managers, according to hackers

6 self-hosted file managers were recommended on Hacker News between November 2025 and November 2026. We rank them by how many separate people recommend each one, and 2 earn the Hacker Approved badge.

Top picks

The two most recommended self-hosted file managers with the badge. Each figure is 2 people. RecommendsCriticizes One comment

  1. copyparty

    39 recommend, 9 criticize, 81% approval

    Ranked 1 of 6 by recommenders

    Easy setup and simple use

    Fast, small, easy-to-set-up file server that people use to move files between devices and serve ebooks. Most common caveat: the web UI is often called obtuse or ugly.

  2. Filestash

    15 recommend, 2 criticize, 88% approval

    Ranked 4 of 6 by recommenders

    Connects to almost any storage

    People recommend Filestash as a self-hosted web frontend that connects to almost any storage through a plugin system. The most common caveat is thin documentation that makes setup harder.

All 6 self-hosted file managers, ranked

Select a column heading to sort. Approval share is recommenders out of everyone who gave an opinion; the tick on each bar marks the 2 to 1 line the badge needs. Months counts the months, out of 13, in which someone recommended it.

Self-hosted file managers ranked by the number of people who recommend them
Rank
1copyparty39981%10—Approved
2Samba362163%12——
3NFS201853%9——
4Filestash15288%109 yrs3 ownersApproved
5FileBrowser80100%4——
6Netatalk7188%3——

How we rank

Rank is the number of separate people who recommend a product in a Hacker News comment over the past year. Someone who praises the same self-hosted file manager in five threads counts once.

The badge goes to self-hosted file managers that at least 10 people recommend, with recommenders outnumbering critics at least 2 to 1, recommended in at least 4 of the 13 months.

Rankings are never for sale. We may earn a commission when you buy through our links. It never changes the order.